• Home
  • Free Resources
    • Storyboard Depot
    • Instructional Design Programs
    • Best Photo Sites
    • Graphic Editing Tools
    • Icon Collections
  • My Books
  • About
  • Book Store
  • MASTERING INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN

The eLearning Coach

For designing effective learning experiences

Connie Malamed
  • Podcasts
  • Career
  • LXD
  • eLearning Design
    • Audience
    • Instructional Design
    • Learning Objectives
    • Storyboarding
    • Tests
    • User Interface
  • eLearning 2.0
  • Cognition
  • Multimedia
    • Audio
    • Graphics
    • Video
  • Reviews
    • Book Reviews
    • Software Reviews
  • At Work
You are here: Home / Cognition / What makes someone an expert?

What makes someone an expert?

The Cognitive Psychology of Expertise

by Connie Malamed

Share5
Tweet4
Share
Pin5
14 Shares

what makes someone an expert

One goal of learning design is to support individuals as they progress from limited proficiency toward competence and, in some cases, expertise. Understanding what distinguishes experts from novices can help learning professionals better support that progression.

Understanding expert thinking provides valuable insights into how to help novices develop similar skills and behaviors. Researchers have investigated differences between experts and novices across a variety of fields, and this research shows that expertise is more than the accumulation of knowledge or experience. Also, expertise is highly domain-specific. People may demonstrate expert performance in one area while remaining novices in another.

Building Interconnected Knowledge

Cognitive psychologists propose that experts organize knowledge into complex schemas, or interconnected mental structures. These structures are built through years of purposeful study, varied experience, feedback, and practice that continually refines knowledge and skills. Experts build connections between concepts, principles, and practical knowledge. Rather than a random set of unrelated and isolated facts, expert knowledge is an interrelated network of knowing what and knowing how.

When knowledge structures are interconnected, different retrieval cues will call up similar information. For example, if you take your car to an expert mechanic, they will have many potential memory paths for diagnosing why your car isn’t running. The sounds the engine makes, memories of similar repairs, diagrams of components, diagnostic procedures, and underlying mechanical principles can all activate relevant knowledge.

In this way, the expert mechanic has multiple paths to determining the cause of a problem. An interconnected network of knowledge therefore provides multiple opportunities to recall knowledge from long-term memory.

Recognizing Meaningful Patterns

Experts are good at making inferences, drawing conclusions, and finding solutions. Because their knowledge is organized around meaningful patterns, causal relationships, and underlying principles rather than isolated facts. This organized framework enables them to quickly recognize situations and efficiently retrieve relevant knowledge. They often see meaningful relationships and patterns that novices overlook, allowing them to identify likely causes, anticipate problems, and narrow the range of possible solutions.

Solving Problems Efficiently

“Faced with a problem situation, experts quickly form solutions that are more likely to be effective than solutions formed by novices” (Ertmer et al. 2008). Over the years of experience, experts refine and test their hypotheses and solutions. Their substantial knowledge affects what they notice and how they interpret signals. These adaptations lead to better decision-making and performance (Persky & Robinson, 2017).
Experts often have quick ways to resolve issues because their knowledge can be applied across a broad range of contexts and conditions. When they see a novel problem, they don’t need to waste time taking an irrelevant path. This makes them quick at problem-solving. In many situations, experts can solve familiar problems almost automatically, freeing up mental resources to concentrate on complex situations. See Expert Thinking and Novice Thinking.

Monitoring Their Thinking

Many experts develop strong metacognitive skills that help them monitor and adjust their thinking. They can watch themselves learn and solve problems. As they monitor and evaluate their performance, they adjust their strategies to develop new approaches. For example, a diagnostician will ask the patient a set of questions about their symptoms. If the case becomes complex and the physician feels stumped, the expert will notice that the current strategy is not working. The physician will then modify their approach by asking the patient different questions, consulting a peer physician, or ordering additional tests

Conclusion

Novices differ in many ways from those with expertise in a domain. Experts have greater knowledge organized into meaningful frameworks and better strategies for retrieving and applying it. They perceive larger patterns, develop problem-solving paradigms, and continually evaluate their own thinking to optimize results. Keep this in mind when supporting experts.
On the other hand, novices may lack many well-formed schemas in a particular domain, so they need help building meaningful connections and recognizing patterns. Direct instruction, practice with real-world problems, context-sensitive feedback, and reflection will gradually support the development of expertise.

For ideas on how to design for experts, see Novice Versus Expert Design Strategies: The Expert Reversal Effect. For general strategies that work for novices, see the articles on retrieval practice and elaboration.

References:

  1. Ertmer, Peggy A. et al. How instructional design experts use knowledge and experience to solve ill-structured problems. Performance Improvement Quarterly, v21 n1 p17-42 2008. 26 pp.
  2. Logan, Gordon D. Automatic Control: How Experts Act Without Thinking. Psychological Review, Vol 125(4), Jul, 2018 pp. 453-485. http://www.psy.vanderbilt.edu/faculty/logan/Logan2018.pdf.
  3. Nelms, A.A. & M. Segura-Totten. Expert–Novice Comparison Reveals Pedagogical Implications for Students’ Analysis of Primary Literature. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Winter; 18(4): ar56. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829068/
  4. Persky, A. & J.D. Robinson. Moving from Novice to Expertise and Its Implications for Instruction,
    American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education November 2017, 81.
  5. Rousseau, Denise M. & Jeroen Stouten. 2025. Experts and Expertise in Organizations: An Integrative Review on Individual Expertise. Annual Review Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 12:159-184. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-020323-012717

Comments

  1. Maria says

    December 8, 2021 at 6:23 am

    I’d say a lot of experience in combo with constant education and WILL to learn new stuff.

    Reply
  2. Gail Chanpong says

    July 19, 2018 at 1:56 am

    Connie Malamed, Thank you for your blog post about designing courses for professional development among experts. As an instructor new to online course design, I plan to keep the characteristics of the experts in mind when developing online courses.

    I would like to ask your premission to paraphrase some of the information in your blog post. Of course, I will be glad to attribute your advice with referenece to your URL and Your eLearning Coach website.

    Best regards,
    Gail Chanpong

    [[ These characteristics of the experts include having knowledge structures that are inter-connected, based on a well-organized and meaningful framework. Experts think holistically, easily identify patterns, and use mental solving problem models. Their own thinking and problem-solving processes are continually updated and strategies adjusted to optimize results. ]]

    SOURCE: Connie Malamed. (2018). Coaching Tips for Experts. The eLearning Coach. Available from : https://theelearningcoach.com/learning/the-experts-brain/

    Reply
    • Connie Malamed says

      July 25, 2018 at 10:00 am

      Of course that’s fine, Gail.

      Reply
  3. Himmat says

    August 12, 2009 at 7:05 am

    Hi

    This is a nice analysis of how expert’s brain work. Thnaks a lot for info. Would be please tell me what a novice should do develop a brain stucture like that of Expert.

    Thank you!

    Reply
    • Connie Malamed says

      August 12, 2009 at 9:58 am

      In many ways, I think the instructional strategies for helping novices become competent are the basis of instructional design. It’s a pretty limitless topic and more instructional strategies will be coming in future topics. Depending on how someone will apply their knowledge and skills to the real world of work, some strategies include: retrieval practice, elaboration and addressing the emotional aspect of learning.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Don’t Miss One Issue: The eLearning Coach Monthly Newsletter

the elearning coach monthly newsletter

LEARN MORE AND SIGN UP

AI and Learning Design

AI and Learning Design

Online Master’s Degree in Learning Design

u of san diego id program

Breaking Into an Instructional Design Career

The career and competencies. Where to network, find job boards, and more.

eBook Cover
Click the image to buy the book.

SITE MENU

Home
Resources
My Books
About
Book Store
Membership Community

TOPIC MENU

Podcasts
LXD
eLearning Design
eLearning 2.0
Cognition
Multimedia (Graphics & Audio)
Reviews
At Work

RESOURCES

Storyboard Depot
Instructional Design Programs
Best Stock Images
PowerPoint Grids
eLearning Examples
Glossary of Online Learning
Graphic Editing Tools
Icon Collections

© Copyright 2023 Connie Malamed · All Rights Reserved