Reality eLearning
July 10, 2009
We have reality tv and virtual reality, so why not reality eLearning? I don’t mean in the visual sense, but in terms of cognition. The purpose of eLearning in the workplace is to improve and enhance job performance. So workplace learning should include a strong dose of reality to prepare learners for the varied situations that arise during work.
As far as I can tell, reality is fluid. It warps, it morphs, it flows, it halts, it screeches and surprises. Events rarely happen as planned and after all, how could they? We are inventing and creating our reality as we go along. This is moment to moment stuff. So with no prepared script to follow, how can we help people prepare for the unknown? How can we add a dose of reality to our courses and why would we want to anyway?
Learning Transfer
The underlying reason for making learning realistic is because we want as much positive learning transfer to occur as possible. Do you ever lie awake at night and ponder how well the skills, knowledge and attitudes explored in your courses transfer to the reality in which your learners live? I thought so. Learning transfer for problem-solving is a big challenge.
For example, how can eLearning help someone handle an employee crisis, deal with an irate customer or fix a crashed server? In each of these situations, the reality has many variables. When positive learning transfer occurs, audience members will take what they’ve learned in one situation (the eLearning course) and use it to solve varied problems in another situation (work).
Your learners will have to quickly:
- Analyze a problem to determine it’s salient characteristics
- Find commonalities between the problem at hand and what they have learned
- Identify broad abstract concepts that solved the problem in a training context
- Apply and adapt the most useful concepts to the current problem
Getting At Someone Else’s Reality
The best way to understand the types of problems that potential learners experience is to get in touch with their work environment. I’ve spent time at a muffler repair franchise, customer service call center and an HIV laboratory, to name a few. The type of information that emerges from informal conversations and observations in the work environment are enlightening. You may also want to take a formal approach for garnering information by using surveys and questionnaires, running focus groups and interviewing sample members of the targeted audience and their managers.
Beware that you may run into a tough spot in your zeal to hang out with the employees. In some organizations, high-level management may not want you to speak with audience members. Although this is a self-defeating approach for the organization, there often isn’t much you can do about it. If obstacles are thrown in your way, you’ll have to make do with interviewing supervisors only. This way, you’ll get at least half of the picture.
When it’s impossible to get on-site and directly into the work environment, telephone interviews are another option. If even this doesn’t work out, make attempts to research the field, read about it and imagine yourself doing what your audience members do. The more you can imagine what work is like from the learner’s perspective, the more realistic and effective your courses will be. Theoretically, this will improve learning transfer. The next article will present some ways to add reality to your courses.
How do you get in touch with your learning audience? Comment below.


Great post!
Another added value to observing in the workplace and interviews during the needs analysis stage is that it is also possible to identify human performance issues.
I have found that after interviews and observations what appeared to be a training need was actually a human performance issue. So often these issues just cannot be identified any other way than being in the trenches.
I am looking forward to your next article on ways to add reality to your courses.
I hear you on how observation can often show up performance issues. I find it infinitely fascinating how even during the front-end discussions with a client, all kinds of issues arise that they did not previously think about. Policy issues, user interface issues as well as performance issues. It’s as though training shows up all the warts in the system =). Hey, that would be a good post! Thanks for your intelligent comment.
I agree that adding reality to eLearning is important. I’ve found that the more realistic the scenario I can place my learners in the more well received and meaningful the training is. I think that you also gain more credibility when you include information that is specifically applicable to your target audience.
Good point about the credibility. The improved credibility alone is a good reason to add realism. Learners need to know they are understood. Thanks for adding to the conversation.
Great post, Connie:
Reality is fluid, and employee responses or reactions to live situations (a teller approached by a bank robber) also differ and are fluid.
I wonder how effective are moderated wikis for continued learning after course completion? A course can’t cover every and all business scenarios. The courses I developed for compliance issues focused on the top 4-6 major ethical issues.
Have you incorporated wikis into the learning activities you’ve created?
Theoretically, creating a wiki for continued learning seems like a perfect idea. A wiki could cover a broader ranges of topics than a course and could be more easily updated. I personally haven’t had the opportunity to do that. I wonder if any readers of The eLearning Coach have implemented this? If so, please let us know. Thanks for the thoughtful comment.